Tuesday, December 18, 2012



Reflection on Distance Learning

In recent reports, estimates of at least 20% of college and university students enroll in at least one distance learning course.  In education, distance learning is becoming an important way for students to attend courses and receive a college education (Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, & Zvacek, 2012).  It takes planning, preparation, time, and effort to create an online course that is beneficial to the students (crlt.umich.edu, n.d.).  The ideas of easily converting a traditional course taught in a classroom are false, and this method is not always a guarantee for success.  Several factors must go into developing a course for online.  Some of these are:  key learning groups or audience, learning objectives, reasons for students enrolling in the course, and the type of delivery method (Schmidt & Gallegos, 2001).  Over the past eight weeks in this course, this course has shed light upon many factors that go into developing an online course.  The future of distance education, the improvement of the status of online courses, and the continual upgrading of distance education are three areas where focus needs to be for the success of online education. 
The idea of distance education replacing the traditional classroom styles is not realistic.  The diversity of students and their styles of learning are not always the best practice methods for all some students (Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, & Zvacek, 2012).  The future of distance education will more than likely rise in the percentage of students taking online courses.  There are many reasons for this increase.  For example, the current teacher shortages, overcrowded classrooms, and lack of federal and state funding are giving students in at risk areas of the country an opportunity to receive a formal education (Huett, Moller, Foshay, & Coleman, 2008).  For many teachers who still are in the traditional classroom, their use of technology in this setting is increasingly dramatically with tools such as smartboards, computers, tablets, and projectors.  For many teachers, the future of technology is not a conversion to online courses, but using technology as a tool to enhance learning (Cohen, 2012).  On the other hand, distance education is an ideal environment for students who must work and go to school, raise children, or just prefer the comfort of taking a course in their own homes is increasing vastly in numbers.  This method of online delivery is especially popular among adult learners who have full time jobs and are raising families (Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, & Zvacek, 2012).  The future of education, in my opinion, is going to be an equal mix of online courses, traditional courses, and the blended hybrid courses.  There is no way correct way to deliver content, and it is vitally important that instructors and educational institutions take all learning styles into account. 
Improving society’s perceptions and views of online distance education are a crucial task in its future success and sustainability.  Many instructors and learners want to ensure that the online course they are teaching or enrolling is of high quality.  In a report by the Sloan Consortium, 1,000 surveys show that most educational are now offering some form of online educational courses.  The same is for businesses and organizations with employee training.  To improve public perceptions of distance education, an instructional designer needs to ensure that any online course he or she develops sets higher standards.  Evaluations and surveys of learners after taking a course is an important way for an instructional designer to address any flaws or cracks in the course (Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, & Zvacek, 2012).  In viewing student surveys, there are three ways to approach revising an online course.  The first is a surface view.  This is just changing any cosmetic or technological errors that could hinder the learning process.  The second is the strategic approach is “approaching” and is when an instructional designer identifies and adjusts any long term goals or processes that an instructor will use in the course.  The third and final approach is “deep learning” and is when the instructional designer examines new facts and ideas that are critical and must be incorporated into the cognitive structure of the course (Armstrong, 2011).  The best way to ensure that distance education courses keep a positive light in the public’s eye is constantly work on improving and creating courses that are challenging and hold up to the educational standards of the past, present, and future theories and trends in education.
The appeal of distance learning courses and their appeal as an alternative form of instructional delivery will eventually level off, and distance learning will become part of mainstream education.  The important part for an instructional designer and instructors is to keep distance learning from becoming a passing fad (Kaufman & Watkins, 2000).  Keeping online courses fresh and on the cutting edge is a constantly and not having a course seen as impractical is a major factor in keeping a course in a positive light.  Successful online universities such as Walden and University of Phoenix shows the positive future of distance education.  Personally, my role as an educator and a future graduate of instructional design is to keep encouraging my students and others to give online courses a chance, and as a viable alternative to traditional classes.  Refining and redefining any online courses that I may teach or develop is another way for me to be a positive force in the growth of online education.  Instructional designers and instructors must keep up on current trends in technology and education.  The idea of living in the past with online education is not an option and is not acceptable.  Everyone that involves themselves in education must be bold and daring in their approaches and techniques in order to continue its success (Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, & Zvacek, 2012). 
The future of distance education and online learning are bright, but it will take effort, time, and much revising.  Nelson Mandela says, “Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world” (brainyquote, n.d.).  Distance education is just one of these ways to help change the world.  It is not an easy task, but the more people educate themselves will make this world a better place.  It not only enhances their personal lives but betters a community as a whole, both locally and globally.

 References
Armstrong, D.A. (2011).  Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning and
Instructional Tools: A Qualitative Study of Undergraduate Students
Use of Online Tools.  Retrieved on December 16, 2012 from
Brainyquotes.com (n.d.).  Nelson Mandela education quote.  Retrieved on December 16, 2012
Cohen, S. (2012).  Distance Learning and the Future of Education.  Retrieve on December 15,
Crlt.umich.edu (n.d.).  Strategies for Online Teaching.  Retrieved on December 10, 2012 from
Huett, J., Moller, L., Foshay, W., & Coleman, C. (2008). The evolution of distance education:
Implications for instructional design on the potential of the web (Part 3: K12).
TechTrends, 52(5), 63–67.

Kaufman, R. & Watkins, R. (2000).  Assuring the Future of Distance Learning.  Retrieved on
            December 16, 2012 from http://megaplanning.com/articles/DEfuture.pdf
Schmidt, E., & Gallegos, A. (2001). Distance learning: Issues and concerns of distance learners.
Journal of Industrial Technology, 17(3). Retrieved from http://atmae.org/jit/Articles/schmidt041801.pdf
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and learning at a
distance: Foundations of distance education (5th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson.


Sunday, December 9, 2012



MIT Open Course – American Urban History I

Distance courses require time and effort to design an effective course that attempts to reach all learners regardless of their background (economic, social, and political) and their learning styles (Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, and Zvacek, 2012).  Many factors go into the development of an online course, and many times an online course design is just a copy and paste project from a real time classroom (lpc1.clpccd.cc.ca.us, n.d.).  Open and free courses are a new trend that many colleges are implementing for learners who desire to expand their knowledge on a topic.  The course is not a design for college credit, but the best practices an online course must have should still be in consideration when designing a course.  Three areas in evaluation are critical when evaluating the usefulness of an online course.  Course pre-planning, online design and course activities are vital in assessing if a course is right for a learner (Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, and Zvacek, 2012).
The open course evaluation for this paper is from the MIT OpenCourseWare website and is a focus on historical studies.  The title of the course is “American Urban History I” (http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/urban-studies-and-planning/11-013j-american-urban-history-i-spring-2010/index.htm) and is a course from Spring 2010 (ocw.mit.edu, 2010).  This course is a fourteen week online course that follows the Equivalency Theory by Desmond Keegan.  The design is a liner approach that appears to be a face to face synchronous course that is a transfer into the online world.  The course appears to be a design that follows Keegan’s theory is due to the fact the course uses a strategy of “equivalency” in the design for all learners.  Keegan states that a learner whether local or distant, should have the same equivalent outcomes from a course. The issue with the equivalency theory is not all learners whether distant or local have the same environments, and online learners tend to have time constraints (Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, and Zvacek, 2012). 
The best practices or recommendations for online instruction are critical and a clear and concise course layout is vital.  The ability to set clear and concise goals, design an effective syllabus, recognize individual student learning styles, and design a course that represents a variety of learning styles is a challenge (sanjuancollege.edu, 2012).  The MIT course from this paper has its challenges in some of these areas.  First, the goals of this course lay out a clear and concise method that gives the learner a detailed calendar of the topics for each weeks and what reading assignments, and goals for every week.  Second, the course does give a syllabus with a course description and assignments and expectations for the course, but it is general and not in depth in content.  Third, the course does not address a variety of learning styles that allow all students to express themselves in the best manner.  The course limits itself to reading, discussion, and a final research paper using primary sources.  The lack of variety and flexibility in the course design is difficult for some to succeed and can be a challenge if a learner does not do well in this environment (Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, and Zvacek, 2012).  There is no reference to technology and computer hardware or requirements that one may need for this course.  It also does not address issues such as plagiarism, netiquette, and assisting any students who may have learning disabilities (lpc1.clpccd.cc.ca.us, n.d.). 
The idea of enrichment learning and project based learning is important when developing an online course.  Since online courses interact either in a synchronous or asynchronous method, the instructor must be sure that the lessons and activities have a design that enriches a student’s understanding of a subject (Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, and Zvacek, 2012).  In this course, the two key enrichment activities revolve around discussion and a research project that uses primary sources (ocw.mit.edu, 2010).  In online discussion questions, it is important that students reflect and deepen their understanding of a topic (ets.tlt.psu.edu, 2008).  In addition, the research paper needs to enhance the learning process on the topic at hand if it is to hold any value to the learner.  Group activities or project base learning activities sometimes make for a valuable enrichment activity for a learner (sanjuancollege.edu, 2012).
An online course whether it is free or for educational credit needs to be an in-depth learning experience for all students.  The design and layout of the course needs to be a well thought out approach that makes the transition from in-class a painless process.  In addition, enriching activities and discussions that force a learner to think deeper is a valuable asset in the long run for all (sanjuancollege.edu, 2012).  Instructors and instructional designers need to keep these thoughts in mind.  The course from MIT may be valuable for many students, but it does not reach all learners because of the lack of a variety of activities.  The effort must be made to reach all learning styles and educate all that desire to learn.
 
References
ets.tlt.psu.edu, (2008).  Introduction to Crafting Question for On-line Discussion.
Retrieved on November 25, 2012 from http://ets.tlt.psu.edu/learningdesign/crafting_question
Fogelson, R., (2010). Massachusetts Institute of Technology: MIT OpenCourseWare.
Retrieved on November 25, 2012 from http://ocw.mit.edu.
lpc1.clpccd.cc.ca.us, (n.d.).  Best Practices in Designing Online Courses.  Retrieved on
            November 25, 2012 from http://lpc1.clpccd.cc.ca.us/lpc/blackboard/best_practices/
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and learning at a
distance: Foundations of distance education (5th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson.
www.sanjuancollege.edu., (2012).  Research on Best Practices.  Retrieved on
            November 25, 2012 from http://www.sanjuancollege.edu/pages/2825.asp

Tuesday, November 13, 2012



Interactive Tours

The increasing number of students taking online courses is expanding at a rapid pace. Students receive a broader idea of the outside world while still inside their home and school.  The interaction of students with other cultures to expose them to multicultural and global view of the world is important in educating students (Germain-Rutherford & Kerr, 2008).  Instructors need to be looking for activities that give students better exposure in these areas.  Field trips outside of the school are becoming more unfavorable due to many factors.  The ability of an instructor to make lessons a real world situation and create the activity in a more student-centered way gives a better mastery of a subject (Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, & Zvacek, 2012).

On-site field trips do have their downfalls such as cost, chaperones, security issues, and transportation (Jackson, n.d.).  The ability for students to interact with museums and places in other parts of the country and the world is an increasingly popular activity in high school and college courses.  In this day and age, people do not have the money to allow their students to take field trips.  The Internet provides these resources to students without having to leave their school building. 

In response to the history teacher scenario, interactive tours can be a valuable resource to allow students to view artwork and exhibitions from around the world.  New York is home to many famous museums such as the Guggenheim and the American Museum of Natural History.  Both museums offer interactive tours for students to view from their websites.  The technology I offer to the history teacher is to use a computer lab that contains computers for each student, as well as a white board, projector, and ability to do two way live video chat.  The teacher or instructional designer will need to contact the museum and arrange a time and place to set up a live interactive tour or interview with the curator.  The software such as Skype is great for online interaction and allows the curator in New York to walk the students through an exhibit.  The curator may potentially have a laptop with a webcam and microphone to help give a tour of the exhibit.  If this is not possible, the museums offer interactive virtual tours that the students can view from their computers.  After this tour, the students and curator can have a live video chat to discuss the exhibit with the curator and the two items of artwork for discussion.

The instructor will need the following technology equipment:

  • Computer Lab equipped with computers for each student.
  • White Board with projector
  • Microphone and web cam capabilities for live interaction
  • Skype software or another form of video chat software.

This technology is a successful way for students to enrich their cultural background and knowledge.  An example of a successful live interactive tour is a live, virtual tour the U.S. Air Force by Lt. Col. Sharon Nehrings.  The tour gives students of a middle school in Oklahoma a live tour of the air force base in Florida (Scott, J., 2012).  The Skype software company also gives instructors many great ideas on how to use their software for interactive live chats in the classroom.  The site URL is https://education.skype.com/ and is free for all educators to use and view.  The Internet, webcams, and computers offer an abundance of free resources for instructors to use in education. 

References

Amnh.org, (2012).  American Museum of Natural History.  Retrieved on November 12, 2012 from http://www.amnh.org/

Germain-Rutherford, A., & Kerr, B. (2008). An inclusive approach to online learning environments: Models and resources. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education TOJDE, 9(2). Retrieved from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde30/pdf/article_2.pdf

Guggenheim.org, (2012).  Guggenheim.  Retrieved on November 12, 2012 from

Jackson, C. (n.d.).  The Benefits of Virtual Field Trips for Students.  Retrieved on November 12, 2012 from http://www.ehow.com/list_5970076_benefits-virtual-field-trips-students.html

Scott, J. (2012).  AOC Hosts First Online Virtual Tour.  Retrieved on November 12, 2012 from

Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (5th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson.

Skype.com, (2012).  Skype in the Classroom.  Retrieved on November 12, 2012 from https://education.skype.com/


Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Distance Education Definition – Past and Present

Distance education is, “an institution based, formal education where the learning group is separated, and where interactive telecommunications systems are used to connect learners, resources, and instructors (Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, & Zvacek, 2012, p. 32).  Distance education also contains four components to it.  They are (Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, & Zvacek, 2012):

  1. Institutionally based
  2. Separation of teacher and student
  3. Interactive telecommunications
  4. Sharing of data, voice, and video (learning experiences)
My own personal definition of distance education before this course began was, “education delivered through a technology based medium where the instructor and student are separated by time and space.”  This definition is somewhat similar to the definition from the textbook for this course but is much broader in the definition. 

The need for quality distance education courses is a priority that all educational institutions need to focus.  Many people today must work more than one job or do not have the time to attend a formal classroom setting.  The enthusiasm and demand for e-learning environments continues to grow, but if the courses do not meet or exceed expectations and standards of the students, then it can create disillusionment and can damage the reputation of distance education (Moller, Foshay, & Huett, 2008).

After the readings from this week, my new definition of distance education is, “a method of formal education in which the instructional delivery method combines a mixture of synchronous and asynchronous through multimedia and online learning methods.  The instructional delivery usually contains a separation of time and space between the instructor and student.”

The future of distance education is bright and has much potential as long as educational institutions continue to invest in their e-learning environment.  The introduction of “No Child Left Behind” requires schools to offer students alternative methods of instruction and show yearly improvement in a students’ progress.  The current teacher shortages, overcrowded classrooms, and lack of federal and state funding give students in at risk areas of the country an opportunity to receive a formal education (Huett, Moller, Foshay, & Coleman, 2008).  Distance education is not a replacement for instructors and the interaction inside a classroom but is an alternative for a student who lives in a less fortunate area to take courses that they not otherwise receive.





References

Huett, J., Moller, L., Foshay, W., & Coleman, C. (2008). The evolution of distance education:
Implications for instructional design on the potential of the web (Part 3: K12).
TechTrends, 52(5), 63–67.

Moller, L., Foshay, W., & Huett, J. (2008). The evolution of distance education: Implications for
instructional design on the potential of the web (Part 1: Training and development). TechTrends, 52(3), 70–75.

Moller, L., Foshay, W., & Huett, J. (2008). The evolution of distance education: Implications for
instructional design on the potential of the web (Part 2: Higher education). TechTrends, 52(4), 66-70.

Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and learning at a
distance: Foundations of distance education (5th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson.